Court says NOAA has no power over offshore aquaculture
Liza MayerNews Business Management Regulations
The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld in August a 2018 decision declaring that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) does not have authority to regulate aquaculture in US offshore waters.
The plaintiffs in the case comprise of fishing and public interest groups who argued that NOAA exceeded its authority to regulate fishing under the Magnuson-Stevens Act by including offshore aquaculture as a “fishing” activity.
Kate Goggin, NOAA Fisheries spokesperson, said the agency is reviewing the Fifth Circuit decision. “We remain committed to expanding the social, environmental, and economic benefits of sustainable marine aquaculture in the US,” Goggin said in an email.
“It is important to note that this ruling is not a prohibition on marine aquaculture, neither nationally nor in the Gulf of Mexico, and we will continue to work with stakeholders through existing policies and legislation to increase aquaculture permitting efficiency and predictability,” she said.
But for some potential investors, the latest decision means the question as to who’s in charge remains unanswered. This uncertainty has kept businesses from applying for offshore aquaculture permits.
For offshore farming advocate Neil Anthony Sims, “this just means that NOAA doesn’t have to issue a permit for any aquaculture.” As this publication reported earlier, his company’s permit for Velella Epsilon, a small-scale yet innovative submersible net-pen trial planned for offshore of Florida, is now in its third year of regulatory review.
“And so our Velella Epsilon project does not require a NOAA permit, but we do need to get a permit from EPA. We also need to get a permit from Army Corps of Engineers,” he said.
It has been more than four years since NOAA opened the federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico to fish farming. The Gulf would have been the test bed for this nascent industry sector, but “nobody wants to be the guinea pig,” a farmer once told this publication.
Print this page